1. Sports
Send to a Friend via Email

Your suggestion is on its way!

An email with a link to:

http://baseball.about.com/b/2013/01/09/rage-against-the-hall-of-fame-machine.htm

was emailed to:

Thanks for sharing About.com with others!

Rage against the Hall of Fame machine

By January 9, 2013

Follow me on:

Baseball writers have a soul, and that's the problem. Almost all take their task of voting for the Hall of Fame very seriously, and I don't think any want the institution of the Baseball Hall of Fame to suffer because of the steroids era in Major League Baseball.

But a few of the cooks seemingly spoiled the broth in 2013, and that's set off a backlash from baseball fans who are angry that there will be no Hall of Famers elected in 2013.

As Jayson Stark of ESPN.com wrote, it's amazing to think that the all-time home run champion, a pitcher who won seven Cy Young Awards, a catcher who made 12 All-Star teams and a player with 3,060 hits were all on the ballot for the first time, yet none of them were elected.

Writes Stark:

"We need to have a long, serious national conversation, starting right now, about where those events fit into the contours of the Hall of Fame. I'm ready if you are.

"Maybe we'll decide we want a Hall of Fame that renders all, or most, of that invisible. Maybe we'll decide we want a Hall of Fame that aspires to be a shrine, not just to greatness but to purity. I don't know how we get there, but maybe that's where this conversation will lead us."

The answer isn't easy, but it doesn't seem like the Hall of Fame is ready to move. Said Hall of Fame president Jeff Idelson, on the Baseball Writers Association of America website:

"The standards for earning election to the Hall of Fame have been very high ever since the rules were created in 1936. We realize the challenges voters are faced with in this era. The Hall of Fame has always entrusted the exclusive voting privilege to the Baseball Writers' Association of America. We remain pleased with their role in evaluating candidates based on the criteria we provide."

Jeff Passan of Yahoo! Sports also called for reform, and for the Hall of Fame to remove its "character" clause.

"The character clause is like so many other things written more than 70 years ago: well-intentioned but positively archaic in 2013."

Before we act in a rash fashion, keep in mind that there could be as many as five players elected next year, even without any players tied to steroid use. Greg Maddux, Tom Glavine and Frank Thomas are on the ballot for the first time, and holdovers Craig Biggio and Jack Morris (in his 15th and final year) have a good chance to break over that barrier.

And perhaps the voters who returned blank ballots will be shamed enough to vote in 2014. And if not, the BBWAA should act to take away their ballots for good. Because if they're not willing to vote for anybody on next year's star-studded ballot, they're just standing in the way.

See: 2013 Hall of Fame voting, with percentage changes.

Comments

January 10, 2013 at 3:46 pm
(1) EZ E says:

Cheating is cheating. Do they deserve an “edge” or the same consideration over those that were clean?? No, they were never actually convicted but we’re not fools either.

January 10, 2013 at 6:55 pm
(2) Peter says:

I am sick to death about hearing about the steroid era. Who cares? They did roids big whoop. What other drugs did the hall of famers IN the hall of fame do? May not have been preformance enhancing but I can bet you it was illegal. And as for those who say that these players (Bonds, Clemens, etc.) cheated, i say is this a hall of fame or a HALL OF MORALS because if that was the case, we have a big problem because alot of those players in the Hall of Fame now are not choir boys. So I say let Bonds, Clemens, etc in the hall of fame and if others are so mad about it, let me ask one last question. Were you crying your eyes out during every home run hit in 1998 or were you following each and every home run?

January 11, 2013 at 12:50 am
(3) Allan Price says:

There should be no place in the B.H.O.F. for juice monkeys.

January 11, 2013 at 11:30 am
(4) mike says:

I think the whole voting process is in serious need of an overhaul, not just because of the self righteousness over the steroids era, the writers should NOT be the only ones charged with voting on the Hall. Note to Jeff Idelson: Its NOT 1936 anymore, theres an intervention called TV, heard of it? And something called the internet, maybe youve heard of that too, there are so many worthy media people who could offer helpful imput, its shameful that the BBWAA continues to be the exclusive keepers of the Hall of Fame.

January 11, 2013 at 1:40 pm
(5) Zeke says:

Funny, I wonder if all the “things change in 70 years” would agree that the 2nd Amendment as it was written 222 years ago, would agree that it should be changed?

Would see hypocritical if they did’nt?

Just saying

Leave a Comment


Line and paragraph breaks are automatic. Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title="">, <b>, <i>, <strike>
Top Related Searches
  • hall of fame
  • rage against
  • gp
    1. About.com
    2. Sports
    3. Baseball

    ©2014 About.com. All rights reserved.